<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Console Spot Forums - PSP DS PS3 Xbox 360 Wii XMB - PC News</title>
		<link>http://www.consolespot.net/forums</link>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest PC News & Releases can be found in this forum.]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 03:01:49 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Mateys, We're Eff'd]]></title>
			<link>http://www.consolespot.net/forums/pc-news/27382-mateys-were-effd.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 01:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[
---Quote---
The internet chapter of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a secret copyright treaty whose text Obama's administration refused to disclose due to "national security" concerns, has leaked. It's bad. It says:

    * * That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn't infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.

    * * That ISPs have to cut off the Internet access of accused copyright infringers or face liability. This means that your entire family could be denied to the internet -- and hence to civic participation, health information, education, communications, and their means of earning a living -- if one member is accused of copyright infringement, without access to a trial or counsel.

    * * That the whole world must adopt US-style "notice-and-takedown" rules that require ISPs to remove any material that is accused -- again, without evidence or trial -- of infringing copyright. This has proved a disaster in the US and other countries, where it provides an easy means of censoring material, just by accusing it of infringing copyright.

    * * Mandatory prohibitions on breaking DRM, even if doing so for a lawful purpose (e.g., to make a work available to disabled people; for archival preservation; because you own the copyrighted work that is locked up with DRM)
---End Quote---
Source (http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/03/secret-copyright-tre.html)

I'm taking an early retirement I assume...:(]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div style="margin:20px; margin-top:5px; ">
	<div class="smallfont" style="margin-bottom:2px">Quote:</div>
	<table cellpadding="6" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%">
	<tr>
		<td class="alt2">
			<hr />
			
				The internet chapter of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a secret copyright treaty whose text Obama's administration refused to disclose due to &quot;national security&quot; concerns, has leaked. It's bad. It says:<br />
<br />
    * * That ISPs have to proactively police copyright on user-contributed material. This means that it will be impossible to run a service like Flickr or YouTube or Blogger, since hiring enough lawyers to ensure that the mountain of material uploaded every second isn't infringing will exceed any hope of profitability.<br />
<br />
    * * That ISPs have to cut off the Internet access of accused copyright infringers or face liability. This means that your entire family could be denied to the internet -- and hence to civic participation, health information, education, communications, and their means of earning a living -- if one member is accused of copyright infringement, without access to a trial or counsel.<br />
<br />
    * * That the whole world must adopt US-style &quot;notice-and-takedown&quot; rules that require ISPs to remove any material that is accused -- again, without evidence or trial -- of infringing copyright. This has proved a disaster in the US and other countries, where it provides an easy means of censoring material, just by accusing it of infringing copyright.<br />
<br />
    * * Mandatory prohibitions on breaking DRM, even if doing so for a lawful purpose (e.g., to make a work available to disabled people; for archival preservation; because you own the copyrighted work that is locked up with DRM)
			
			<hr />
		</td>
	</tr>
	</table>
</div><a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2009/11/03/secret-copyright-tre.html" target="_blank">Source</a><br />
<br />
I'm taking an early retirement I assume...:(</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.consolespot.net/forums/pc-news/">PC News</category>
			<dc:creator>Joomla12</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.consolespot.net/forums/pc-news/27382-mateys-were-effd.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
